smarter treasury management for projects

This edition explores why most project treasuries underperform. Crypto’s capital stack has grown fast - and proved fragile in the process. The October 10–11 crash, which liquidated over $19 billion in positions and pulled down even top-tier assets, was a stark reminder: capital without structure is exposed.

In just a few years, project treasuries have become one of the largest pools of on-chain capital. These include protocol reserves, fee revenues, and owned liquidity—assets and DAO-governed wallets that collectively shape how projects survive market cycles and fund growth.

Across major protocols, more than $21 billion in treasury assets now sit onchain. Giants like Uniswap, Mantle, and Gnosis each manage $1–3 billion, yet much of that capital remains parked in native tokens or idle stablecoins. Stablecoins now account for 35–40% of project treasuries, but most of those balances still earn zero yield.

This gap isn’t a tooling problem. The rails exist; the structure doesn’t.

DeFi already offers tokenized real-world assets exceeding $33 billion, standardized ERC-4626 vaults, and automated execution frameworks. What’s missing is operational design—clear policies, liquidity tiers, and rule-based capital flows that make treasury management transparent, governed, and productive.

On October 10–11, 2025, over $19 billion in leveraged crypto positions were liquidated in less than 24 hours, pulling even top-tier assets into sharp decline. The event was a stark demonstration of systemic fragility: treasuries that were heavily concentrated in native tokens or poorly structured yield strategies faced sudden depletion, while DAOs with clear policies and diversified, risk-managed allocations weathered the shock more gracefully. Market volatility is an operational reality. Structured, rules-based products, paired with tiered liquidity and risk budgets, are the core of resilient treasury management.

For projects, this wasn’t just a market crash; it was a governance stress test. It revealed that treasury resilience isn’t about holding more capital, but managing it intelligently. Smarter treasuries treat liquidity as an instrument, not a buffer, automating how assets move across tiers, yields, and risk limits as conditions change. The next evolution of project finance won’t be about chasing returns; it’ll be about embedding intelligence, discipline, and adaptability directly into treasury architecture.

Concentration is the single biggest determinant of operating capacity.

Most projects hold 80–90% of their treasury in their own native token, not by choice, but by design. The way these treasuries are built relies heavily on token issuance rather than stablecoin inflows or external revenue. This leaves them structurally exposed: when their token’s price falls, the treasury’s value collapses alongside it, tightening budgets and stalling operations, grants, and contributor payments. When sentiment flips bullish, the opposite happens, treasuries swell again. It’s a built-in volatility loop that ties a project’s financial stability directly to its market perception.

Selling large portions outright isn’t just operationally risky-it’s politically fraught. It pressures price, dilutes governance, and often triggers backlash from holders. Without pre-agreed diversification mandates or rebalancing frameworks, rotation into stablecoins becomes a slow, reactive process-usually proposed only after price declines, when the cost of selling is highest. One mitigation is to make native token holdings productive without selling them. That includes staking, delegating, or lending assets into protocol-aligned strategies—ways to earn internal yield without exiting the asset. Some DAOs also deploy native tokens into liquidity pools or structured vaults to monetize idle positions.

Stablecoins, in theory, offer ballast, but in practice, they often sit idle. Even protocols with tens or hundreds of millions in USDC or DAI rarely deploy those stables for yield. That choice turns potential runways and shock absorbers into dead capital. 

Gnosis stands out with the most balanced treasury structure, while Uniswap and Mantle remain overwhelmingly concentrated in native tokens, highlighting how uneven stablecoin diversification still is across leading protocols.

Some projects do experiment with yield strategies, but too often without matching them to cash flow or liquidity needs. Returns are chased in isolation, risks go unpriced, and exposures go unhedged.

Diversification remains the exception, not the rule. Only a few treasuries experiment with ETH, RWAs, or structured vaults. Most still rely on ad hoc proposals, messy spreadsheets, and sporadic multisig execution. The result is an execution that lags, oversight that fragments, and governance that lacks institutional memory.

To illustrate with an example, Uniswap has repeatedly discussed mobilizing part of its sizable UNI-dominated treasury in governance forums. Proposals to diversify or use yield tools have surfaced. Yet the bulk remains locked in native exposure, leaving it sensitive to token volatility.

Ultimately, many project treasuries are stuck in a trap that is concentrated, underutilized capital and brittle operations. Treasury management is reactive rather than strategic, misaligned with the long-term mission and resilience.

A well-managed project treasury is defined by how its capital is structured and governed. The foundation is policy with clear mandates that set risk budgets, define liquidity tiers, and codify rebalancing rules. The goal is to match assets with liabilities so that near-term operations are always covered by stable reserves, while long-term capital compounds beyond them in measured, transparent ways. 

When execution follows rules instead of discretion, treasuries gain resilience. Circuit breakers, rotating signers, and withdrawal limits keep systems steady even under stress. 

Project treasuries are no longer passive token stacks. They’re evolving into modular, rules-based capital systems guided by segmentation, yield, diversification, and active risk management.

> the treasury stack

> structured stablecoin yield

ERC-4626 vaults have transformed how projects put idle stablecoins to work. Instead of sitting unproductive in multisigs, stable reserves can now flow into on-chain, composable yield layers designed for treasury-grade operations.

Vaults like aarnâ’s âtvUSDC demonstrate how idle stable reserves can earn 5–6% native yield while remaining fully on-chain and governance-friendly.

By deploying cash-tier capital into such vaults, projects can extend the operational runway while preserving instant liquidity, full auditability, and compliance with treasury mandates.

The result is a stable reserve that’s productive without being risky. It comes with transparent inflows, rule-based management, and yields that match the governance tone of serious treasuries.

In events like the recent crash, these yield-bearing stable layers act as shock absorbers - preserving runway while markets overshoot.

> diversification

Leading projects are expanding beyond native tokens into index products, tokenized treasuries, and sector-weighted baskets. These allocations reduce correlation risk while keeping governance overhead low. The infrastructure for this shift is already mature as adoption is now the key variable.

> hedging

Native-token-heavy treasuries are experimenting with capped exposure, rolling collars, and basis trades to preserve runway during volatility. Structured hedging is becoming a core component of financial resilience.

> tactical sleeves

Small, time-boxed allocations allow projects to experiment safely with capped budgets, clear exit conditions, and transparent post-mortems that keep experimentation disciplined.

Together, these practices turn static balances into governed capital stacks.

The new generation of treasury operations is about better vaults, rails and operators. Infrastructure protocols set the foundation for automated, rule-based execution; specialist managers build on top of that to align yield, liquidity, and governance. 

> infrastructure rails

• Yearn v3: Automated, multi-strategy vaults that tag each strategy with risk labels tied to community mandates. Commonly used for stablecoin and LP-based strategies that compound passively within governance-defined limits.

• Beefy Finance: A multichain vault engine that auto-compounds and rebalances across protocols. Ideal for projects diversifying into stable or LP-based yield while staying fully on-chain.

• Aragon OSx: A modular governance framework enabling on-chain treasury proposals, yield module plug-ins, and transparent audit trails — the connective tissue between policy and execution.

> aarnâ

aarnâ is building the next generation of onchain treasury infrastructure, autonomous, transparent, and designed to evolve into a full-stack system for project treasuries. Unlike managed treasury programs that depend on off-chain operators or multisig discretion, aarnâ’s vaults run completely on-chain. Allocation, rebalancing, and yield routing all execute directly on-chain, minimizing manual intervention and preserving full auditability.

Its vault architecture already spans stablecoin yield, AI x quant, and diversified index strategies—each aligned with distinct risk tiers and time horizons. This approach lets projects progressively structure their capital: stable reserves earning a predictable yield, reserve buffers compounding through quant-driven vaults, and long-term capital diversified across DeFi indices.

A concrete example is âtvUSDC, aarnâ’s on-chain stablecoin yield vault that allocates capital across leading lending markets like Aave and Compound. It dynamically routes deposits to earn 5–6% native yield—all without leverage or opaque rehypothecation. Already live and composable across protocols like Pendle (with Morpho and Euler integrations underway), âtvUSDC shows how a single ERC-4626 vault can anchor a transparent, liquid, and governance-friendly treasury position.

Together, aarnâ’s modular vault stack marks the early foundation of a programmable treasury framework, turning idle reserves into productive, policy-aligned capital over time.

Smart project treasuries manage the assets and processes. Across the ecosystem, a few operating patterns are becoming standard:

> mandates and reviews: Governance-approved policies define who can move funds, under what limits, and on what cadence. Monthly or quarterly reviews keep runway, reallocations, and risks in check.

> signer safeguards: Rotating signers, circuit breakers, and layered permissions reduce fragility and spread control.

> transparency logs: Recording failed transactions, delays, or exceptions builds accountability and creates institutional memory for rotating contributor teams.

These aren’t yield strategies, but they’re the foundations. Treasuries that treat operations as infrastructure - not overhead - are the ones that adapt faster and endure longer.

Project treasury reports are evolving from static balance sheets into strategy-aware dashboards that capture not just what’s held, but how capital actually works. The best treasuries report movement instead of mere numbers. 

> key lenses include:

• liquidity runway: How many months of operating expenses are covered by liquid assets; the baseline for every decision.

• duration profile: When assets unlock: now, 30–90 days, or long-term, thereby aligning funding timelines with risk.

• concentration risk: Exposure to single issuers or protocols, with thresholds that trigger rebalancing.

• policy vs. actual: How current allocations stack up against governance-approved mandates.

• process health: Cadence, exceptions, and reporting quality that reflect operational resilience alongside portfolio size.

As stable reserves move into vaults and aggregators, yield transitions from a performance metric to a part of liquidity itself.

Reports now track three live dimensions of capital:

Reports now focus on three live dimensions of capital — the essentials every treasury should monitor:

• base reserves: spendable capital sustaining daily operations) 

• yield inflows: monthly passive income from deployed stables and vaults 

• lock-up profile: average duration and accessibility of committed assets.

Together, these create a dynamic snapshot of how liquidity, income, and access interact across the treasury stack which are turning reports from static ledgers into living dashboards of deployed capital.

If stables are aggregated via âtvUSDC, reports should also track monthly inflows, current APR band, and the vault’s liquidity service-level agreement (SLA) to ensure transparent, policy-aligned performance.

In early 2025, Polkadot transitioned from passive reserves to structured deployment, thereby reallocating idle assets with defined purpose and measurable outcomes.

The treasury moved ~$1.5M in USDT into Centrifuge’s RWA Yield Pool, tapping real-world cash flows via tokenized short-duration credit. Simultaneously, ~$4.1M in DOT was deployed into a DeFi liquidity pool, targeting programmatic yield within the crypto-native stack.

One key shift was the automation of DOT-to-stablecoin conversion. By smoothing token volatility and rebalancing into USDC/USDT, Polkadot insulated its operational runway from native-token swings, which is a frequent failure point in DAO budgeting.

The impact was material:

• first net-positive quarter reported

• stable reserves extended to cover 10+ years of operations

• yield recycled back into ecosystem grants and contributor payments 

By turning idle stables and volatility into runway, Polkadot revealed how minimal deployment via clear policy can yield outsized outcomes.

This was risk-aware optimization. Polkadot demonstrated that even modest allocations, deployed through clear mandates and automated pipelines, can transform a treasury from idle to regenerative.

Project treasuries face layered risk (technical, financial, governance, and regulatory) with real consequences, including stalled votes, frozen funds, and liquidity gaps. Risk doesn’t announce itself; it compounds quietly. 

Beyond smart-contract or bridge failures, treasuries often suffer from overconcentration, illiquidity, and duration mismatches. Native-token exposure ties operating capacity to market cycles. Governance delays and shifting regulations add further instability. 

In 2024, Nouns DAO’s treasury experiment collapsed amid an internal split, and nearly half its assets were drained as governance fractured. That outcome exposed a lack of guardrails and stable buffers - assets moved when alignment broke.

Risk isn’t theoretical. Treasuries need automated limits and fallback pathways before they’re tested. 

Structured, yield-bearing stable reserves don’t eliminate risk - but they create the buffers treasuries need to maintain continuity, absorb shocks, and respond without panic. They’re becoming core to modern treasury architecture, translating policy into pre-defined exposure boundaries and execution rules.

> risk matrix: how smart treasuries absorb shock

Treasuries that operationalize these safeguards turn risk into something measurable that is managed within visible and enforceable boundaries. 

For most contributors joining a project, the first question isn’t about yield, but clarity. Where’s the capital, and how long will it last? That visibility defines confidence more than any APY ever could.

The core primitives for intelligent treasury management already exist. Yield-aggregating vaults turn stable reserves into active income. Automated rebalancers preserve liquidity while extending the runway. Policy-aligned strategies like âtvUSDC make stable yield programmable, auditable, and composable across DeFi.  

The next challenge is governance. Projects need systems that convert intent into action and complexity into transparency.

The next edge in project treasury design lies in policy-grade stable reserves, transparent yield reporting, and governance that can act on pre-approved rules.

Capital isn’t meant to sit. It’s meant to serve a purpose.

Curve DAO is navigating legal disputes involving contributor haowi.eth and Onekey founder Wang Lei over a claimed vulnerability. Despite tensions, Curve’s governance and tokenomics—such as locked CRV supply—have supported stability.

Aave DAO has launched Umbrella, an on-chain risk management system replacing its Safety Module. Built by BGD Labs, it enables staking of aTokens to provide automated, asset-specific deficit coverage, removing reliance on governance votes and embedding risk protection directly into yield-bearing assets.

Curve Finance founder Michael Egorov has launched Yield Basis, a protocol designed to unlock sustainable Bitcoin yield on-chain via capped liquidity pools.

Coinbase has integrated the Morpho lending protocol into its app, allowing USDC holders to earn up to 10.8% yield through DeFi vaults. The move expands access to on-chain lending while stablecoin adoption and regulatory debates accelerate.

top DeFi tweets

@EntropyAdvisors outlined how the Arbitrum DAO treasury grew by $8.3M in August, closing at $88M. ETH’s 20% rally contributed $5.2M, while $2.9M came from new stablecoin inflows. The portfolio now stands at 53% RWAs, 38% ETH, and 9% stables. 

@coinbureau has flagged a rare move: ETH’s 4H RSI just plunged below 15 — only the 19th time in a decade. Translation? ETH looks seriously oversold, flashing one of its rarest signals in 10 years.

@LidoFinance has set a new record, with total value locked climbing to $41 billion — its highest dollar-denominated TVL ever. A fresh reminder of just how central Lido has become to Ethereum staking.

reflections-

Gain an edge in DeFi alpha with aarnâ’s AI-driven insights and DeFi vaults. Try the dApp now.